From: National Wildlife Federation
Published November 4, 2004 02:23 PM

Federal Judge Again Halts Dredging in the Snake River

Army Corps of Engineers Plan Harms Salmon, Violates Law

SEATTLE, WA - In a victory for clean water, salmon, and taxpayers, a federal court today ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the second time in as many years to delay a risky $2.7 million project to dredge the lower Snake River. The court found that significant legal flaws and serious risks of harm to imperiled salmon and steelhead precluded the Corps from dredging during the winter of 2004-05 as planned.

“Dredging in the lower Snake River is environmentally risky and economically unsound,” said Jan Hasselman, Seattle counsel for the National Wildlife Federation, the lead plaintiff in the case. “There are better ways to manage this river that would save money and give salmon and steelhead a fighting chance to recover.”

The decision represents the second time in two years that the Corps has failed to adopt a dredging plan in the lower Snake River that can pass legal muster. In 2002, the same court halted dredging until the Corps corrected serious problems in its long-term sediment management plan for the Snake River. Today’s court ruling sends the Corps of Engineers back to the drawing board to try again to put forward a plan that complies with the law. Conservation and fishing groups, along with the Nez Perce Tribe of Idaho, had asked for a hearing on the plan, and hailed the ruling.

“The court’s ruling today is part of a larger pattern in the past two or three years where courts have had to repeatedly step in to protect our wild salmon by holding government agencies accountable,” said Todd True, an attorney with Earthjustice representing the plaintiffs. Last summer, a federal court in Oregon blocked a government plan to take away water flows that salmon need to survive. Before that, the courts threw out a government plan for restoring endangered Columbia River salmon, calling it inadequate and illegal. “This repeated disregard for the law hurts all of us in this region and needs to stop,” True concluded.

In today’s ruling, the court ruled that the Corps had violated the law by failing to prepare an adequate Environmental Impact Statement for the proposal. And the court agreed with plaintiffs that salmon and steelhead in the Snake River could not afford yet another insult to their already degraded habitat, characterizing the harm to these species as “irreparable.”

“Dredging could have devastating impacts on what little salmon habitat remains in the Snake River,” said Glen Spain of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermens’ Associations (“PCFFA”), another plaintiff in the case. “There is no such thing as salmon-friendly dredging, and tearing up the riverbed is not recovery.” Spain contends the Corps seems determined to press ahead with this project without a thought for the thousands of commercial fishermen who have lost their jobs as a result of the Corps’ mismanagement of the Columbia and Snake Rivers. He believes the sooner that we can move ahead with real salmon recovery in the Columbia, the sooner those jobs will be restored.

The injunction issued by the court prevents the Corps from dredging this winter, as currently planned. The delay in dredging adds to mounting questions about the long-term viability of the Snake River barge transportation network, which is encountering competition from Puget Sound ports that are attracting an increasing share of the region’s business.

“Improved rail infrastructure to meet the needs of shippers should be a priority for the region,” said Bert Bowler of Idaho Rivers United. “Washington is working diligently to preserve shortline railroads in the eastern part of the state that will add certainty to the transportation system in the long run. Idaho should be doing the same.”

The plaintiffs include the National Wildlife Federation, Washington Wildlife Federation, Idaho Rivers United, Idaho Wildlife Federation, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Association, the Institute for Fisheries Resources and the Sierra Club. The case is being handled by attorneys Jan Hasselman at NWF and Todd True at Earthjustice.

Protecting wildlife through education and action since 1936, the National Wildlife Federation is America's conservation organization creating solutions that balance the needs of people and wildlife now and for future generations

For Immediate Release: November 3, 2004

Contact: Jan Hasselman, NWF – office: 206-285-8707 x 105; cell – 206-719-6512
Bert Bowler, IRU – 208-343-7481
Todd True, Earthjustice – 206-406-5124
Glen Spain, PCFFA – 541-689-2000

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

2017©. Copyright Environmental News Network