WASHINGTON- The Obama administration Friday issued its first review of species that are candidates for protection as endangered species, identifying a total of 249 species in need of protection. The review also describes the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's progress in listing these species, showing that the administration has, to date, only listed one species - a Hawaiian plant reduced to a handful of individuals.

"This review shows that the Obama administration has not substantially improved the dismal record of the Bush administration in providing protection to the nation's critically endangered wildlife," said Noah Greenwald, endangered species director at the Center for Biological Diversity. "Protection of only one species in 10 months reflects a failure to enact substantial reforms in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service."

During its eight-year tenure, the Bush administration protected a mere 62 species - a rate of fewer than eight species per year. This compares to 522 species protected under the Clinton administration, at an average rate of 65 per year, and 231 species protected under the George H.W. Bush administration, for an average rate of 58 per year. With only one species listed so far, at this point the Obama administration seems to be flatlining in terms of new listings for candidate species.

"Continued delays in protection of these 249 species is a failure of leadership by Interior Secretary Salazar," said Greenwald. "And that failure is placing these species at greater risk of extinction. The position of chief of conservation and classification hasn't even been filled yet, exemplifying the failure of the Obama administration to prioritize species conservation."

Many of the candidate species have been waiting for protection for decades - delays that have real and often lethal consequences on the ground, with at least 24 species having gone extinct after being designated candidates for protection.

"Because extinction is forever, delays in protection of the nation's most imperiled species are unacceptable," said Greenwald. "The Endangered Species Act can save these 249 species, but only if they are granted protection."

The Center and other groups have a pending lawsuit in Washington, D.C., arguing that continued delay in protecting the now-249 candidate species is illegal. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is not making expeditious progress listing species as required by the Endangered Species Act.

Background on the Candidate Species

The 249 candidates include a wide variety of species, from shorebirds such as the red knot, which migrates along the Atlantic Coast during one of the longest migrations in the animal world, to the aboriginal pricklyapple, a cactus found in Florida, to the Pacific fisher, a relative of the mink and otter that is dependent on old-growth forests on the West Coast. Being designated as a candidate does not provide any formal protection to the 249 species, a number of which have been waiting for protection for almost as long as the Endangered Species Act has existed. On average, the candidates have been waiting 20 years for protection.

The current review includes eight new species since the last review: Florida bonneted bat, yellow-billed loon, roundtail chub, diamond darter, rabbitsfoot clam, Goose Creek milkvetch, Kentucky gladecress, and Florida bristle fern. Four species were removed, including the fat-whorled pondsnail, troglobitic groundwater shrimp, and two plants, Calliandra locoensis and Calyptranthes estremerae.  

Each of the candidates are given a priority number ranging from 1 to 12 based on their taxonomic rank (e.g. species, subspecies or population) and magnitude and immediacy of threats, with lower numbers indicating higher priority. The majority of candidates are rated as either priority 2 or 3, meaning they are in immediate danger of extinction.

Contact Info: Noah Greenwald, (503) 484-7495

Website : Center for Biological Diversity