Canada panel suggests $2 bln carbon capture plan

Typography
OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canadian governments should spend C$2 billion ($2 billion) to encourage the capture and storage of carbon to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, a government-commissioned panel recommends. The panel report, released late on Thursday, flags carbon capture as a way of curbing emissions while continuing to make economic progress, but the panel said it needs government help to get the idea off the ground.

OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canadian governments should spend C$2 billion ($2 billion) to encourage the capture and storage of carbon to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, a government-commissioned panel recommends.

The panel report, released late on Thursday, flags carbon capture as a way of curbing emissions while continuing to make economic progress, but the panel said it needs government help to get the idea off the ground.

"Canada possesses the technology, geology, and expertise to be a world leader in the development and implementation of CCS (carbon capture and storage) technology," the report said.

"But as with any new environmental technology, a financial gap exists between the cost of a plant with CCS and what would otherwise be built to produce the same industrial outputs."

!ADVERTISEMENT!

The panel, chaired by Steve Snyder, president of TransAlta Corp., Canada's publicly traded energy generator, said the C$2 billion in government aid should help industry get three to five projects operational by 2015.

The technology involves separating carbon dioxide from emissions from large industrial or energy-producing facilities. The carbon dioxide is then compressed and injected deep underground.

Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper set up the panel last year.

Harper, elected in 2006, has said Canada will not be able to meet its obligations under the Kyoto protocol on climate change without taking steps he said would cause economic havoc. He has instead looked largely to technological innovations which have yet to get off the ground in a large-scale commercial way.

The Pembina Institute, an environmental group, expressed concern, saying carbon capture should not be used as a replacement for having large polluters -- such as Alberta's oil sands producers -- reduce their emissions of the greenhouse gases that are linked to global warming.

It also disagreed with a recommendation that taxpayers should help subsidize the projects.

"It is neither necessary nor appropriate for the governments to accept a recommendation that every Canadian should pay over $70 for industry to cut its own pollution," Dan Woynillowicz, the group's senior policy analyst, said in a statement.

($1=$0.99 Canadian)

(Reporting by Randall Palmer and Allan Dowd; Editing by Peter Galloway)