As the police attacks on protesters in Minnesota continue -- see this video of the police swarming a bus transporting members of Earth Justice, seizing the bus and leaving the group members stranded on the side of the highway -- it appears increasingly clear that it is the Federal Government that is directing this intimidation campaign.
As the police attacks on protesters in Minnesota continue -- see this
video of the police swarming a bus transporting members of Earth
Justice, seizing the bus and leaving the group members stranded on the
side of the highway -- it appears increasingly clear that it is the
Federal Government that is directing this intimidation campaign.
Minnesota Public Radio reported yesterday that "the searches were led
by the Ramsey County Sheriff's office. Deputies coordinated searches
with the Minneapolis and St. Paul police departments and the Federal
Bureau of Investigation."
Today's Star Tribune added that the raids were specifically "aided by
informants planted in protest groups." Back in May, Marcy Wheeler
presciently noted that the Minneapolis Joint Terrorist Task Force -- an
inter-agency group of federal, state and local law enforcement led by
the FBI -- was actively recruiting Minneapolis residents to serve as
plants, to infiltrate "vegan groups" and other left-wing activist
groups and report back to the Task Force about what they were doing.
There seems to be little doubt that it was this domestic spying by the
Federal Government that led to the excessive and truly despicable home
assaults by the police yesterday.
So here we have a massive assault led by Federal Government law
enforcement agencies on left-wing dissidents and protesters who have
committed no acts of violence or illegality whatsoever, preceded by
months-long espionage efforts to track what they do. And as
extraordinary as that conduct is, more extraordinary is the fact that
they have received virtually no attention from the national media and
little outcry from anyone. And it's not difficult to see why. As the
recent "overhaul" of the 30-year-old FISA law illustrated -- preceded
by the endless expansion of surveillance state powers, justified first
by the War on Drugs and then the War on Terror -- we've essentially
decided that we want our Government to spy on us without limits. There
is literally no police power that the state can exercise that will
cause much protest from the political and media class and, therefore,
from the citizenry.
Beyond that, there is a widespread sense that the targets of these
raids deserve what they get, even if nothing they've done is remotely
illegal. We love to proclaim how much we cherish our "freedoms" in the
abstract, but we despise those who actually exercise them. The
Constitution, right in the very First Amendment, protects free speech
and free assembly precisely because those liberties are central to a
healthy republic -- but we've decided that anyone who would actually
express truly dissident views or do anything other than sit meekly and
quietly in their homes are dirty trouble-makers up to no good, and it's
therefore probably for the best if our Government keeps them in check,
spies on them, even gets a little rough with them.
After all, if you don't want the FBI spying on you, or the Police
surrounding and then invading your home with rifles and seizing your
computers, there's a very simple solution: don't protest the
Government. Just sit quietly in your house and mind your own business.
That way, the Government will have no reason to monitor what you say
and feel the need to intimidate you by invading your home. Anyone who
decides to protest -- especially with something as unruly and
disrespectful as an unauthorized street march -- gets what they deserve.
Isn't it that mentality which very clearly is the cause of virtually
everyone turning away as these police raids escalate against citizens
-- including lawyers, journalists and activists -- who have broken no
laws and whose only crime is that they intend vocally to protest what
the Government is doing? Add to that the fact that many good
establishment liberals are embarrassed by leftist protesters of this
sort and wish that they would remain invisible, and there arises a
widespread consensus that these Government attacks are perfectly
tolerable if not desirable.
During the Olympics just weeks ago, there was endless hand-wringing
over the efforts by the Chinese Government to squelch dissent and
incarcerate protesters. On August 21, The Washington Post fretted:
Six Americans detained by police this week could be held for 10 days,
according to Chinese authorities, who appear to be intensifying their
efforts to shut down any public demonstrations during the final days of
the Olympic Games. . . .
Chinese Olympic officials announced last month that Beijing would set
up zones where people could protest during the Games, as long as they
had received permission. None of the 77 applications submitted was
approved, however, and several other would-be protesters were stopped
from even applying.
On August 2, The Post gravely warned:
Behind the gray walls and barbed wire of the prison here, eight
Chinese farmers with a grievance against the government have been
consigned to Olympic limbo.
Their indefinite detainment, relatives and neighbors said, is the
price they are paying for stirring up trouble as China prepares to host
the Beijing Games. Trouble, the Communist Party has made clear, will
not be permitted.
Would The Washington Post ever use such dark and accusatory tones to
describe what the U.S. Government does? Of course it wouldn't. Yet how
is our own Government's behavior in Minnesota any different than what
the Chinese did to its protesters during the Olympics (other than the
fact that we actually have a Constitution that prohibits such
behavior)? And where are all the self-righteous Freedom Crusaders in
our nation's establishment organs who were so flamboyantly criticizing
the actions of a Government on the other side of the globe as our own
Government engages in the same tyrannical, protest-squelching conduct
with exactly the same motives?
Just review what happened yesterday and today. Homes of college-aid
protesters were raided by rifle-wielding police forces. Journalists
were forcibly detained at gun point. Lawyers on the scene to represent
the detainees were handcuffed. Computers, laptops, journals, diaries,
and political pamphlets were seized from people's homes. And all of
this occurred against U.S. citizens, without a single act of violence
having taken place, and nothing more serious than traffic blockage even
alleged by authorities to have been planned.
A man whose sister was one of those arrested at one of the raided
houses in Minneapolis yesterday emailed me a photograph of her and her
friend who was also arrested -- Monica Bicking (r.) and Eryn Trimme --
and he wrote this:
They are still in custody. I've been told that the police have 36
hours to charge her, and that 36 hours starts after the labor day
holiday, so they only have to charge her sometime Wednesday. It seems
unlikely that they'd do anything to expedite her or Eryn's release.
They were then planning to actually board up her house for unspecified
"code violations", but apparently her neighbors were very vocal, and
the police ended up agreeing not to do anything so long as the front
door was fixed by 6pm (the front door they'd busted in).
Heres is the extraordinary blog item I linked to yesterday from Eileen
Clancy, one of the founders of I-Witness Video -- a NYC-based video
collective which is in St. Paul to document the policing of the
protests around this week's Republican National Convention, just as
they did at the 2004 GOP Convention in New York. Clancy wrote this as a
plea for help, as the Police surrounded her house and (before they had
a search warrant) told everyone inside that they'd be arrested if they
exited the home:
This is Eileen Clancy . . . The house where I-Witness Video is staying
in St. Paul has been surrounded by police. We have locked all the
doors. We have been told that if we leave we will be detained. One of
our people who was caught outside is being detained in handcuffs in
front of the house. The police say that they are waiting to get a
search warrant. More than a dozen police are wielding firearms,
including one St. Paul officer with a long gun, which someone told me
is an M-16.
We are suffering a preemptive video arrest. For those that don't know,
I-Witness Video was remarkably successful in exposing police misconduct
and outright perjury by police during the 2004 RNC. Out of 1800
arrests, at least 400 were overturned based solely on video evidence
which contradicted sworn statements which were fabricated by police
officers. It seems that the house arrest we are now under and the
possible threat of the seizure of our computers and video cameras is a
result of the 2004 success.
We are asking the public to contact the office of St. Paul Mayor Chris
Coleman at 651-266-8510 to stop this house arrest, this gross
intimidation by police officers, and the detention of media activists
and reporters.
That sounds like what it was: a cry for help from a hostage. Hours
later, the Police finally obtained a search warrant -- for the wrong
house, one adjacent to the house where they were being detained -- and
nonetheless broke in, pointing guns, forced them to lay on the floor
and handcuffed everyone inside (and handcuffed a National Lawyers Guild
attorney outside). They searched the house, arrested nobody, and then
left.
Any rational person planning to protest the GOP Convention would, in
light of this Government spying and these police raids, think twice --
at least -- about whether to do so. That is the point of the raids --
to announce to citizens that they best stay in their homes and be good,
quiet, meek, compliant people unless they want their homes to be
invaded, their property seized, and have rifles pointed at them, too.
The fact that this behavior is producing so little outcry only ensures,
for obvious reasons, that it will continue in the future. We love our
Surveillance State for keeping us safe and maintaining nice, quiet
order.
UPDATE: A Professor at the University of Minnesota who lives in the
neighborhood where one of the homes was raided yesterday sent
photographs he took which rather conclusively demonstrate federal
involvement in these raids:
And Feministing has the video -- here -- of the scene yesterday where
journalists were detained, along with an interview with the homeowner
whose house was raided.